We use some essential cookies to make this website work.
We’d like to set additional cookies to understand how you use forestresearch.gov.uk, remember your settings and improve our services.
We also use cookies set by other sites to help us deliver content from their services.
Provenance trials of native tree species are used to determine whether our tree populations differ in terms of adaptive variation and the scale over which these differences operate. Currently, an administrative system (the Forest Reproductive Material 2002 Regulations) for identifying and tracking the source of seed and plants used in the establishment of new native woodlands divides Britain into four Regions of Provenance which are further divided into 24 Native Seed Zones.
The seed zones are further divided into those areas that are either below or above 300 m in altitude. This system applies to all native tree species with the sole exception of Scots pine which has its own seed zones based on the results of biochemical analyses. However, as there is little evidence to underpin this system, provenance trials of three native tree species (Scots pine, rowan and ash) have been established at a range of sites in Britain.
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) is the foundation species of the Caledonian forest. Currently, 84 native Scots pine fragments remain in Scotland and occur across a broad range of conditions. Scots pine is wind pollinated and its seeds are wind dispersed.
Trials were established as part of a collaboration between CEH, Edinburgh University and the James Hutton Institute.
The Scots pine trials are based on plants derived from seed collected from four mother trees in each of 21 Scottish provenances of Scots pine grown at two locations. The trials were initially pot based but were later planted out in 2011/12 at sites in the south and northeast of Scotland. Early results of the pot based trials demonstrated populations contain high levels of adaptive variation and differ in several traits of adaptive significance (Salmela et al. 2011,2013[1]).
Ash and rowan have wide natural distribution ranges and contrasting reproductive and dispersal systems. Ash is wind pollinated and its seeds are wind dispersed. In contrast, rowan is insect pollinated and its seeds are dispersed by birds. A collection of ash seed was undertaken in 2003 and rowan in 2004. Where possible, seed was collected from two stands of native origin in each native seed zone across Britain as defined in Forestry Commission Practice Note 8.[2] The family structure was not retained in the design of the trials. The distribution of the populations sampled can be seen from the maps here:
Experiment numbers, planting years and locations of genetic conservation ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) trials.
Experiment number | Planting year | Grid reference | |
FR07032a | Dunkeld 23 | 2008 | NN 931 544 |
FR07032b | North York Moors 146 | 2007 | SE 078 891 |
FR07032c | Llandovery 50 | 2007 | SN 802 311 |
FR07032d | Alice Holt 474 | 2007 | SU 824 207 |
Experiment numbers, planting years and locations of genetic conservation rowan (Sorbus aucuparia L.) trials.
Experiment number | Planting year | Grid reference | |
FR06002a | Dornoch 13P06 | 2006 | NC 573 086 |
FR06002b | North York Moors 143P06 | 2006 | SE 954 888 |
FR06002c | Llandovery 49P06 | 2006 | SN 801 311 |
FR06002d | Alice Holt 473P06 | 2006 | SU 820 402 |
After one year in the nursery the rowan seedlings were planted out into provenance trials at four sites located. The ash planting followed a year later. The four trial sites for rowan all established well. For the ash, the trial site in Scotland failed largely due to poor ground preparation and the one at Alice Holt grew very poorly. However, there was good establishment in the remaining two sites.
Early results demonstrate that provenances exhibit differences in adaptive traits such a flushing and age at onset of flowering.
[1] Salmela, M.J., Cavers, S., Cottrell, J.E., Iason, G.R. & Ennos, R.A. (2011). Seasonal patterns of photochemical capacity and spring phenology reveal genetic differentiation among native Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) populations in Scotland. Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 1020-1029. Matti J. Salmela, Stephen Cavers, Joan E. Cottrell, Glenn R. Iason & Richard A. Ennos 2013. Spring phenology shows genetic variation among and within populations in seedlings of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the Scottish Highlands. Plant Ecology & Diversity DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2013.795627.[2] HERBERT, R., SAMUEL, S. and PATTERSON G.S., (1999). Using local stock for planting native trees and shrubs. Forestry Commission Practice Note 8. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.
We use cookies to store information about how you use the dwi.gov.uk website, such as the pages you visit.
Find out more about cookies on forestresearch.gov.uk
We use 3 types of cookie. You can choose which cookies you're happy for us to use.
These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form. They always need to be on.
We use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so we can improve it based on user needs. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about: how you got to the site the pages you visit on forestresearch.gov.uk and how long you spend on each page what you click on while you're visiting the site
Some forestresearch.gov.uk pages may contain content from other sites, like YouTube or Flickr, which may set their own cookies. These sites are sometimes called ‘third party’ services. This tells us how many people are seeing the content and whether it’s useful.