Skip to main content
An image of new planted woodland with trees and saplings in tree guards.

Overview

The English Tree Planting Programme will contribute to the Government’s commitment to increase tree planting to 30,000 hectares per year by 2025. Alongside environmental and economic benefits, there will be social benefits associated with this. Therefore, this planting programme provides a valuable opportunity to assess public attitudes to new planting and the social benefits associated with it, including how this may vary across diverse populations. It is also an opportunity to help us better understand why some people can’t or don’t benefit from woodland creation and expansion and what we can do about it.

This research will pilot a longitudinal social research approach. This is research which assesses how attitudes, benefits and barriers change over time in relation to new tree planting. We will look at this from an individual and a community perspective.

This project is part of the Nature for Climate Fund.

Publications

  • Karlsdottir, B., 2023. Qualitative Longitudinal Methods for Forest Social Science: A Review (in publication).
  • O’Brien, L., FitzGerald, O., Bursnell, M., Ambrose-Oji, B., and Edwards, D., 2021. England Tree Planting Programme: Experimental Plots. A scoping report for social research (internal document).

Related research

Research objectives

  1. Identify and develop connections with forest/woodland sites and communities to study over time;
  2. Explore attitudes, motivations, actions, barriers and benefits linked to new woodland creation and expansion (new planting) for diverse communities.
  3. Develop and test a proof-of-concept* for longitudinal research to study how attitudes, motivations, actions, barriers and benefits for communities local to new planting change over time.

*proof-of-concept refers to establishing through testing whether such longitudinal research is feasible, what it would contribute, and how it could be achieved.

Research Questions

  1. What do local community members who have visited the site think about the intervention (new planting and expansion of woodland) and how it has come about?
  2. What do local community members who have not visited the site (but are aware of the intervention) think about it and how it has come about?
  3. What impact has the intervention had on local community members who visit/engage with the site?
  4. What impact, if any, has the intervention had on local community members who have not visited (but are aware of the intervention)?
  5. How do we best capture the above change in attitudes, motivations, actions, barriers and benefits linked to woodland creation and expansion for diverse communities over time?
  6. What lessons can we take from the above to inform such interventions to help them improve provision of benefits and to maximise access/engagement with such sites (where this is an aim) and minimise negative impacts (on site and visitor)?

Latest updates

In scoping this work we produced a literature review and developed a theoretical framework.

From this we decided to take a mixed methods approach:

Questionnaires

Focusing on communities within 30 mins walk of the new planting sites, we designed and tested a survey questionnaire with this hyper-local population. This approach follows engagement and benefits from the new planting sites at a community scale.

The first wave of testing utilised and compared face to face and Computer Aided Telephone Interview methods. Using the learning from this first wave we are designing a second wave, to be delivered in the late autumn 2024.

Interviews

Focusing on individuals who visit their local new planting site, we are using a qualitative approach to understand how their engagement with the site and related benefits has changed over time.

Given the short funding window we are utilising a case biography approach and repeat interviews to expand our frame of reference. We have delivered two waves of interviews and the third is scheduled for September 2024.

Analysing the interview data after each wave has enabled us to adapt the approach and also to feed in to wave 2 of the quantitative survey questionnaire approach.

 

Current funding for this project finishes in March 2025.

Funding & partners
Table of Contents

Related content

Publications

Public perspectives of treescape creation, expansion, management and maintenance (a review)

This review aims to answer the question “what are the public perspectives of woodland creation, expansion, management and maintenance?” (where woodland is taken to refer to trees in any location and context). Using a combination of structured search strings and key word searches, the search process uncovered 81 relevant publications from 15 countries, published between 1996 and 2021 (inclusive). Given the policy ambitions for tree planting and woodland expansion across Great Britain, from the United Kingdom (UK), Welsh and Scottish Governments, the findings from this review are timely. The findings provide valuable evidence of possible public reactions to new planting, afforestation and changes to management, and identify gaps in the evidence where further work is required.

Publications

Preferences for natural features and artificial infrastructure in woodlands and forests

This review provides evidence of preferences for artificial infrastructure and facilities, and other natural features (alongside trees) that different people favour in different treescapes. Evidence is drawn from 41 international studies from 2002-2022.

Publications

Social benefits from the Forestry Commission public forest Estate in England: Review of current evidence

A review of the Forestry Commission's estate in England as part of a study to show how the estate contributes to society today and how it might sustainably serve society's long-term needs. By Anna Lawrence, Claudia Carter, Liz O’Brien and Rebecca Lovell. Related pages People, trees and woodlands Social forestry research

Authors
Head shot of FR staff Member Beth Brockett
Beth Brockett

Senior Social Scientist

Head shot of FR staff Member Elliot Colley
Elliot Colley

Social Scientist (Behavioural Science Specialist)

Forestry Staff ClareHall.2e16d0ba.fill 600x600 1
Clare Hall

Behavioural Scientist

George Murrell

Social Scientist