Science provides evidence and evidence informs policy. But how exactly does the relationship work? One of Forest Research’s own scientists decided to find out and discovered three key lessons for scientists that can help improve their impact on policy.
Spatial scientist Chloe Bellamy had the rare opportunity to spend two days at Holyrood last December shadowing Roseanna Cunningham, Cabinet Secretary for Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform. Chloe’s goal was to get a better understanding of the day-to-day work of a policymaker and to gain an insight into how scientific information is considered during the policy making process.
With access to all but the most sensitive of meetings, Chloe joined the Cabinet Secretary for a wide range of appointments, from consultations on the new Climate Change Plan, to prioritising resources across the breadth of policy issues falling within the Cabinet Secretary’s portfolio.
So, what did Chloe learn from this experience? She explains:
“I learnt so much. For example, it really highlighted to me the mismatch in science and policy timetables and the importance of being ready to respond quickly to policymakers’ calls for evidence with clear summaries of research findings. I came away with three key lessons on how scientists can improve their impact on policy:
Chloe gained this opportunity by applying for the Parliamentary shadowing scheme run by the British Ecological Society on an annual basis.
A new study, led by Forest Research, has been published which looks at whether Ips typographus would select Sitka spruce, compared to Norway spruce, as a host for breeding, and for the first time, reviews the chemical ecology behind these choices.
Forest Research is looking for private woodland or forest managers to participate in a research project. We’re investigating how the risk of climate change is perceived and the extent to which adaptation measures are built into management plans.
Forest Research is leading Defra’s NCEA programme, measuring, mapping and assessing England’s ecosystems and natural capital to inform environmental policy and sustainability.
A new study, led by Forest Research, has been published which looks at whether Ips typographus would select Sitka spruce, compared to Norway spruce, as a host for breeding, and for the first time, reviews the chemical ecology behind these choices.
Forest Research is looking for private woodland or forest managers to participate in a research project. We’re investigating how the risk of climate change is perceived and the extent to which adaptation measures are built into management plans.
Forest Research is leading Defra’s NCEA programme, measuring, mapping and assessing England’s ecosystems and natural capital to inform environmental policy and sustainability.