Forest Research has recently examined some long-term experiments to examine provenance variation of emerging species. Individual reports for the species covered so far can be found here. The table at the bottom of this page is a summary of how the results compare with Forestry Commission Bulletin 66, which only included four of the species.
Species | FC Bulletin 66 | Recent work |
European sliver fir | Not included | Provenances from
Calabria, Italy should be first choice of origin |
Pacific silver fir | Not included | Little variation in native range, use material from British Columbia, the Olympic Mountains and
western Cascades of Washington |
Low’s fir | Not included | Study shows that best provenances were from the north of its natural range |
Noble fir | Included – a promising source was US Seed Zone 451, east of Portland | Best areas for future seed collections are the Cascade mountains in northern Oregon and southern Washington |
Japanese red cedar | Not included | Best provenances come from the mid-latitudes of Honshu (34-38°N), Japan |
Coast redwood | Not included | Avoid southerly origins south of the San Francisco Bay Area. |
Western red cedar | Included – best source was Olympic Mountains Washington (US Seed Zone 21) | Best Provenances are the coastal region of Washington and British Columbia between 46°N and 50°N |
Western hemlock | Included – best sources were Vancouver Island (BC Seed Zone 1020) and Washington (US Seed Zone 212) | Provenances from Vancouver Island and the Cascades of Washington and Oregon
performed well as did two provenances from the British Isles |
Grand fir | Origins from Region I (Olympic Peninsula and the
Puget Sound) have grown uniformly well on all sites |
Seed origins from coastal Washington should be preferred |
Red oak | Not included | Seed origins between latitudes of 41°N and 44°N from the Great Lakes region showed significantly better growth compared to more northerly ones |