There is increasing interest in understanding, valuing and supporting the variety of ecosystem services that forests and woodlands can provide in the United Kingdom. These services include the capture and storage of carbon, the interception of rainwater, and the provision of wellbeing benefits.
Landowners and managers can play an important role in the provision of forest ecosystem services through active woodland management and woodland creation. There is interest in understanding the mechanisms which could be used to encourage land management activities which support this delivery.
In a newly published report, Forest Research’s Liz O’Brien and Bianca Ambrose-Oji, along with researchers from the Sylva Foundation and the University of Oxford, explain research investigating land manager understandings of payments for ecosystem services (market mechanisms to support delivery of ecosystem services), as well as their use of formal and informal networks to support decision-making, and the ways in which they learn from others.
The research found that many land managers were not familiar with the term ‘ecosystem services’ or the concept of ‘payments for ecosystem services’. However, they did often recognise that their woodlands could provide a range of benefits to society.
The research also revealed that land managers use a range of formal and informal networks to support their decision-making. Important networks are those related to place (in particular those in their immediate locality), networks related to woodland management and associated institutions, and networks related to social and personal identity.
Learning, on an individual basis or through others (so called ‘social learning’), is important in changing individual and group behaviours. Social learning is an important consideration in land management where new schemes, particularly those associated with payments for ecosystem services, may rely on landscape and community scale change.
The research found land managers most often associated learning with conceptual and practical thinking and were interested in learning about strategies for maintaining the sustainability of their forests in the face of climate change, pest and diseases, or for ensuring economic stability.
The research concluded that payments for ecosystem services, networks and social learning could be helpful approaches used to encourage greater woodland management and woodland creation and the delivery of forest ecosystem services. These could be considered independently or in varying combinations as part of a multi-faceted approach. They could also be combined with other mechanisms to provide land managers with a mix of options of support. The research emphasised the importance of understanding and engaging with land managers to involve them in the design of the mix of approaches that might be used.
The Rapid Review of Evidence on Biodiversity in Great Britain’s Commercial Forests is a review of evidence on biodiversity in many of the most commonly encountered commercial high forest types in Great Britain.
Top tips on how to develop a biosecurity action plan are now available from the Forest Research Climate Change Hub*, providing landowners and managers with the latest information on how to prevent the introduction and spread of harmful pests and pathogens.
Forest Research runs follow-up survey to discover more about community tree nurseries.
The Rapid Review of Evidence on Biodiversity in Great Britain’s Commercial Forests is a review of evidence on biodiversity in many of the most commonly encountered commercial high forest types in Great Britain.
Top tips on how to develop a biosecurity action plan are now available from the Forest Research Climate Change Hub*, providing landowners and managers with the latest information on how to prevent the introduction and spread of harmful pests and pathogens.
Forest Research runs follow-up survey to discover more about community tree nurseries.